IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
AJAY BHANOT, J.
Rajendra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Others – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30292 of 2024
Decided On : 04-10-2024
(A) POCSO Act - Sections 16 and 17 - Bail application - The applicant, father of the victim, sought bail in a case involving serious charges under the POCSO Act. The trial court's rejection of bail was based on the victim's rights not being upheld, including the absence of a support person and legal aid. The court emphasized the necessity of realizing statutory rights for child victims to ensure fair legal processes. (Paras 5, 6, 8, 16)
(B) Rights of Victims - The court highlighted the importance of statutory support systems for child victims, including legal aid and medical care, to empower them in legal proceedings. The court mandated that trial courts ensure compliance with the POCSO Act's provisions during bail hearings. (Paras 7, 9, 10)
Facts of the case:
The applicant has been in jail since 04.11.2022, and the victim, aged 14, identified him as the principal offender in a trafficking case. The trial court noted the gravity of the offence and the victim's vulnerability.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the applicant had not made a case for bail due to the serious nature of the charges and the victim's identification of him as the offender.
Issues: The court addressed the need for statutory rights of child victims to be realized in bail proceedings and the responsibilities of trial courts in this regard.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the absence of support systems for the victim undermines the legislative intent of the POCSO Act, and trial courts must ensure compliance with the Act's provisions during bail hearings.
Result: Bail application dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
AJAY BHANOT, J.
1. Matter is taken up in the revised call.
2. Heard Shri M.P. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Chandan Agrawal, learned AGA-I for the State.
3. By means of this bail application the applicant has prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 516 of 2022 at Police Station-Chaubeypur, District-Varanasi under Sections 376, 120B I.P.C. and Section 16/17 of the POCSO Act. The applicant is in jail since 04.11.2022.
4. The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned trial court on 06.07.2024.
5. From the records and the submissions of the learned A.G.A. it is evident that the victim has not been apprised of her rights to a support person and a legal counsellor. The records do not depict the appointment of support person or legal aid/counsel for a victim. Status of grant entitlements of the victim under the POCSO Act are also absent in the records of the State. This assumes importance in view of the fact that the victim is the daughter of the applicant.
6. The issue that arises for consideration in the bail application is the need and the manner to realize the rights of child victims under the POCSO Act offences in bail proceedings.
7. Victims under the POCSO Act are entitled for various support systems like support person, legal aid, medical care, counselling services and other beneficial schemes of the State Government. The child victims of sexual abuse are a most vulnerable class of citizens. The children of the said class are often incapacitated in their search for justice by other disabling circumstances like the trauma of the incident, social marginalization, financial penury, legal illiteracy and the like. Bereft the support systems guaranteed by the statute, child victims of sexual offences under the POCSO Act cannot prosecute their cases effectively before the competent court.
8. The realization of the statutory rights of child victims of sexual offences under the POCSO Act is the key to empower them to engage with the legal process on a fair footing. The statutory support systems enhance the capacity of the said victims to interface with officials and secure their rights. Empowerment of children who are victims of sexual offences is an imperative necessity to remove the barriers in their search for justice. And the same can be achieved by fruition of their statutory rights. Denial of rights vested in child victims of sexual offences by the POCSO Act during court proceedings will defeat the legislative intent of the statute and result in miscarriages of justice.
9. Various authorities have been created under the POCSO Act to uphold the rights of victims. The said authorities like police, Child Welfare Committee, District Legal Services Authorities, medical authorities, district administration are enjoined by the statute to provide the entitlements under the POCSO Act to victims like support persons, medical specialists, legal aid, beneficial schemes of the government and so on. Responsibility is cast on the courts/magistrates considering the bail applications in POCSO offences to ensure that entitlements of the victims are provided and the rights conferred by the said enactment are enforced. Faithful execution of the said responsibilities will ameliorate the disadvantages faced by child victims in legal proceedings.
10. The rights and entitlements of the victims under the POCSO Act can be realized at the stage of bails and during the trials only by bringing the concerned statutory authorities like Child Welfare Committee (C.W.C.) medical authorities and the police authorities within the scope of the jurisdiction of the learned magistrates/learned trial courts. The said authorities shall remain accountable to the learned magistrates/trial courts for the purposes of implementing the rights of the aforesaid victims during the course of various legal proceedings including bails. The said authorities have to apprise the trial court about the manner in which the rights of victim
AI
The court emphasized the necessity of upholding the statutory rights of child victims under the POCSO Act during bail proceedings to ensure fair access to justice.
A victim has the right to be heard in bail proceedings, especially in serious offences, as mandated by the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and corresponding rules.
The court affirmed that while the victim must be informed of bail proceedings under the POCSO Act, they are not required to be included as a party to such applications, promoting their rights to repr....
Point of law: The POCSO Act, 2012 read with POCSO Rules, 2020 is a special legislation. It is open to the High Court on the administrative side to consider the feasibility of creating specific rules ....
(1) Persons nominated in Section 439(IA), Cr.P.C. may not be obligated to attend but are certainly entitled to be present at hearing of bail application in POCSO Act, 2012 offences – Notice to victim....
The court established that the rights of children residing with incarcerated parents must be prioritized, mandating educational and developmental support systems to mitigate the adverse effects of im....
Court mandates victim notification in bail applications under POCSO to uphold justice and victim rights.
Issuance of prior notice to victim/complainant for suspension of sentence in pending appeal preferred by the appellant/accused convicted under the offences against woman or child punishable under the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the child to legal representation, participation in proceedings, and the mandatory presence of the informant or authorized perso....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.