SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2514

BRIJ RAJ SINGH
Aftab – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Ashok Kumar, Chandra Prakash, Neeraj Kumar Rastogi.
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

Table of Content
1. bail application details and applicant's claims. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. conditions for granting bail established. (Para 5 , 6)
3. limited observations for this bail decision. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Brij Raj Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Diwakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused record.

2. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.328 of 2023 under Section 2 /3 of U.P. Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, PS Imiliya Sultanpur, district Sitapur.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that on the basis of single case, gang chart has been prepared against the applicant. He has submitted that in the said case, the applicant has been granted bail copy of which have been annexed as Annexure No.3 to the bail application. He has explained criminal history of the applicant of two cases. He has submitted that in one case, the applicant has been granted bail and in another case he has been acquitted. The said fact has been stated in para-29 of the bail application. He has further submitted that the applicant shall not abscond and will fully coo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top