Back
JASPREET SINGH
Ranbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's service and promotion procedure. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. circumstances leading to petitioner's suspension. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. state's justification for withholding promotion. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. petitioner's rebuttal to state's claims. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. legal rationale concerning sealed cover procedure and promotion rights. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. conclusion directing promotion review. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
Jaspreet Singh, J.
Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Counsel along with Sri S.M.Faraz I. Kazmi. learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs which read as under:-
3. The submission of learned Senior Counsel for th
The mere pendency of a criminal case does not justify withholding promotion without formal charges, violating principles of natural justice and discrimination.
Service Law - Non- implementation of order of promotion - Appointments of officers are subject to DAR/Vigilance/ Criminal case clearance by Railways - Officers should be advised that above officiatin....
Sealed cover procedure for promotion cannot apply unless formal charges exist. Officers suspended but not charged are entitled to promotion based on DPC's recommendations.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the mere pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground for denying promotion, and the subsequent service record of the petitioner should b....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
