SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2258

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIVEK CHAUDHARY, MANISH KUMAR, JJ.
Gaurav Garg - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India And Others - Respondents
WRIT C NO. 10532 OF 2023.
Decided On : 04-12-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Manjusha Kapil.
For the Respondents: A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.

Refunding of passport amid criminal proceedings is permissible with court authorization, emphasizing public interest balancing with individual rights under the Passport Act, 1967.

Headnote:(A) Passport Act, 1967 - Section 6(2)(f) - Notification dated 25th August, 1993 - Application for passport renewal - Criminal case pending against petitioner - The provision allows for non-issuance of passport if proceedings are pending; however, exemptions can be granted by court, thus not absolute. (Paras 3, 5, 6)

(B) Constitutional Law - Article 14 - Discrimination claims on Section 6(2)(f) - The court emphasized the validity of the legislative provision, noting it is not unconstitutional and serves public interest in preventing individuals facing criminal charges from traveling abroad. (Paras 14, 6)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner sought passport renewal amid ongoing criminal proceedings under IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, with respondents denying renewal based on Section 6(2)(f).

Findings of Court:
The court adjudicated that the bar on issuance is not absolute and articulated the need for court permission to amend the condition.

Issues: The core issues pertained to the issuance of passports amidst criminal proceedings and the interpretation of Section 6(2)(f).

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the restriction is not absolute due to Section 22’s allowance for exemptions; judicial discretion can permit exceptions based on public interest.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks passport despite pending criminal case. (Para 2)
2. section 6(2)(f) of the passport act outlines conditions preventing passport issuance. (Para 3)
3. court acknowledges exemptions under section 6(2)(f) and associated notification. (Para 4 , 6)
4. petitioner to seek court permission for travel abroad. (Para 7)
5. writ petition dismissed with guidance for further applications. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsel for parties.

2. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is a criminal case pending against the petitioner in the Court of Criminal jurisdiction for an offence under Sections 4 98A, 504 & 506, I.P.C. and Sections 3 /4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, Hazaratganj, District Lucknow, and he says that petitioner wants to go abroad and needs a Passport for the same, but respondents are not renewing the same.

3. We find that as per Section 6(2)(f) of the PASSPORT ACT , 1967 one of the grounds for non issuance of a Passport is that proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before the Criminal Court in India. Of course this provision is subject to the other provisions in this Act. Now, we find that in exercise of powers under Section 22 (a) of the PASSPORT ACT , 1967 the Central Government has issued a notification dated 25th August, 1993 which reads as under:-

"Government Of India

Ministry Of External Affairs

Notification

    New Delhi, the 25th August, 1993

    G.S.R. 570(E). - In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of section 22 of the Passports Act, 1967 (15 of 1967) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of External Affairs no. G.S.R.298(E), dated the 14th April, 1976, the Central Government, being of the opinion that it is necessary in public interest to do so, hereby exempts citizens of India against whom proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by them are pending before a criminal court in India and who produce orders from the court concerned permitting them to depart from India, from the operation of the provisions of Clause (f) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the said Act, subject to the following conditions, namely:-

    (a) the passport to the issued to every such citizen shall be issued--

    (i) for the period specified in order of the court referred to above, if the court specifies a period for which the passport has to be issued; or

    (ii) if no period either for the issue of the passport or for the travel abroad is specified in such order, the passport shall be issued for a period one year;

    (iii) if such order gives permission to travel abroad for a period less than one year, but does not specify the period validity of the passport, the passport shall be issued for one year; or

    (iv) if such order gives permission to travel abroad for a period exceeding one year, and does not specify the validity of the passport, then the passport shall be issued for the period of travel abroad specified in the order;

    (b) any passport issued in terms of a(ii) and a(iii) above can be further renewed for one year at a time, provided the applicant has not travelled abroad for the period sanctioned by the court; and provided further that, in the meantime, the order of the court is not cancelled or modified;

    (c) any passport issued in terms of a(i) above can be further renewed only on the basis of a fresh court order specifying a further period of validity of the passport or specifying a period for travel abroad;

    (d) the said citizen shall give an undertaking in writing to the passport issuing authority that he shall, if required by the court concerned, appear before it at any time during the continuance in force of the passport so issued.

[No.VI/401/37/79]

L.K. PONAPPA, Jt. Secy. (CPV)"

4. The provisions of Section 22 of the Act, 1967 read as under:-

    "22. Power to exempt.--Where the Central Government is of the opinion that it is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top