SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1870

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, MANJIVE SHUKLA
Pawan Kumar Rajbhar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ravindra Kumar Yadav,Sandeep Kumar Yadav.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.,Saurabh Kumar Tripathi.

Judgement Key Points

Yes, this judgment clearly supports the position that a passport cannot be denied solely on the basis of a pending criminal case or appeal. The court emphasizes that the word "proceeding" in relevant provisions of the Passports Act includes not only trials but also investigations and inquiries, which are stages prior to cognizance being taken by a court. The judgment underscores that the law and government orders permit the issuance of passports even when criminal proceedings are pending, provided certain conditions are met, such as obtaining permission from the competent criminal court. Moreover, the court directs authorities to ensure transparency, efficiency, and proper communication, and explicitly states that passports should not be withheld solely based on reports of non-cognizable cases or pending investigations without objective consideration. This reinforces the principle that pending criminal proceedings, by themselves, do not automatically justify denial of a passport.


JUDGMENT

Heard Sri. Chandrakant Tripathi, Sri. Ravindra Kumar Yadav, Sri. Shubhash Chandra Maurya, Sri. Piyush Patel, Sri. Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam, Sri. Sanjeet Kumar Mishra, Sri. R.B. Pal, Sri. Brijesh Kumar Mishra, Sri. Praveen Kumar Chaubey, Sri. Abhijeet Kumar Pandey, Sri. Abhay Mishra, Sri. Rajeev Upadhyay, Sri. Mohd. Imran, Sri. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, Sri. Mohammad Iliyas, Sri. Amar Singh Yadav, Sri. Parashuram Baranwal, Sri. Vipin Kumar Singh and Sri. Amar Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri. Sunil Mishra, Sri. Saurabh Kumar Tripathi, Sri. Raj Shekhar Srivastava, Sri. Dinesh Chandra Tripathi, Sri. Ashish Kumar Mishra, Sri. Sarvshwar Lal Srivastava, Sri. Ravi Prakash Singh, Smt. Kiran Bala, Smt. Swarn Lata Suman, Sri. Chandra Vijay Singh, Sri. Raman Saxena, Sri. Ashish Tripathi, Sri. Vijay Raj Pal, Smt. Anju Srivastava, Sri. Dharmendra Singh and Sri. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent- Union. Later, before this order could be signed Sri. S.P.Singh the learned A.S.G.I. has appeared and offered invaluable assistance and suggestions.

2. On the request of the Court, Sri. A.K. Sand, learned Government Advocate has appeared and offered valuable as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top