SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2832

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Namo Narayan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pranjal Shukla.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Piyush Agrawal, J.

Heard Mr. Pranjal Shukla for the petitioner and Mr. Rishi Kumar, learned A.C.S.C. for respondents.

2. The instant Writ Tax is being entertained by this Court in view of the fact that G.S.T. Tribunal is not functional in the State of Uttar Pradesh pursuant to the Gazette notification of the Central Government bearing number CG-DL-E-14092023-248743 dated 14.09.2023.

3. By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 20.12.2019 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, respondent no. 3 and the order dated 27.6.2022 passed by the Additional Commissioner, respondent no. 2.

4. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a proprietorship firm having G.S.T.I.N. No. 09AJPC0956DIZG and engaged in the business of civil construction works in various government departments. On 7.12.2019 a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner but no reply was submitted to it and by order dated 20.12.2019, the G.S.T. registration of the petitioner was cancelled. Against the said order, the petitioner has preferred an appeal which has also been rejected by the impugned order dated 27.6.2022. Hence the present petition.

5. Learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top