SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2832

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Namo Narayan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pranjal Shukla.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

Table of Content
1. petition due to gst tribunal inactivity. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner argues against vague notice, cancellation. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court highlights lack of cogent reasoning. (Para 7 , 8)
4. need for reasons in judicial decisions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. writ allowed; orders set aside. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Piyush Agrawal, J.

Heard Mr. Pranjal Shukla for the petitioner and Mr. Rishi Kumar, learned A.C.S.C. for respondents.

2. The instant Writ Tax is being entertained by this Court in view of the fact that G.S.T. Tribunal is not functional in the State of Uttar Pradesh pursuant to the Gazette notification of the Central Government bearing number CG-DL-E-14092023-248743 dated 14.09.2023.

3. By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 20.12.2019 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, respondent no. 3 and the order dated 27.6.2022 passed by the Additional Commissioner, respondent no. 2.

4. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a proprietorship firm having G.S.T.I.N. No. 09AJPC0956DIZG and engaged in the business of civil construction works in various government departments. On 7.12.2019 a show cause notice

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top