RAJESH BINDAL, J. J. MUNIR
Ans Handicrafts – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Commercial Taxes – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
By the Court.-By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated March 11, 2019 vide which the registration certificate of the petitioner has been cancelled.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is a registered firm engaged in trading of hardware and aluminium goods. It was duly registered under U.P. Goods and Service Tax. A survey was conducted on February 11, 2019 at the business premises of the petitioner wherein 29 loose papers were found. As according to the Department, certain discrepancies were found in the stock, the turn-over of the petitioner was enhanced on the presumption that there were suppressed sales. Notice for assessment was issued under Section 74 of U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ''the Act'') for the period April' 2018 to February' 2019. Huge demand of more than ¹ 6 crore was raised. The petitioner preferred appeal, which was finally partially accepted. On the other hand, a notice was issued to the petitioner on February 26, 2019 to show-cause as to why t
Woolcombers of India Ltd. v. Workers Union
Bombay Oil Industries (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital
Gurdial Singh Fijji v. State of Punjab
H.H Shri Swamiji of Shri Amar Mutt v. Commr., Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Deptt.
Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Shyam Sunder Jhunjhunwala
Keshav Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Mahabir Prasad Santosh Kumar v. State of U.P
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education v. K.S Gandhi
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
ORYX Fisheries Private Ltd. v. Union of India
Rama Varma Bharathan Thampuram v. State of Kerala
S.N Mukherjee v. Union of India
Siemens Engg. and Mfg. Co. of India Ltd. v. Union of India
Som Datt Datta v. Union of India
Star Enterprises v. City and Industrial Development Corpn. of Maharashtra Ltd.
Quasi-judicial authorities must provide reasoned orders to ensure fairness and prevent arbitrary actions.
The court underscored the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, requiring that administrative orders affecting rights must include clear reasoning and a fair opportunity for respons....
Cancellation of GST registration must follow due process, including a clear show-cause notice and a reasoned order, to uphold the principles of natural justice.
Judicial and administrative orders must provide reasons to uphold natural justice; lack of reasoning renders such orders indefensible.
Taxation - Business of providing goods - Absence of indication of grounds on which registration of petitioner was liable to be cancelled or alleged breaches committed by petitioner which was likely t....
Quasi-judicial orders must provide reasons to comply with principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution.
Quasi-judicial orders must provide reasons to comply with Article 14 of the Constitution, ensuring fairness and the right to a hearing.
Quasi-judicial orders must provide reasons to comply with Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal standards.
Quasi-judicial orders must provide reasons to comply with constitutional mandates, ensuring fairness and application of mind in decision-making.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.