SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2786

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Purna Trading Company – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Pranjal Shukla, Advocate.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Piyush Agrawal, J.

Heard Mr. Pranjal Shukla for the petitioner and Mr. Rishi Kumar, learned A.C.S.C. for respondents.

2. The instant Writ Tax is being entertained by this Court in view of the fact that G.S.T. Tribunal is not functional in the State of Uttar Pradesh pursuant to the Gazette notification of the Central Government bearing number CG-DL-E14092023- 248743 dated 14.09.2023.

3. By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 20.11.2020 / 7.12.2020 and 21.1.2021 passed by respondent no. 3 and 5 respectively and the order dated 17.11.2021 passed by respondent no. 2.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a proprietorship firm having G.S.T.I.N. No. 09CCBPS0675N1Z0, engaged in retail whole sale business and deposited all due tax liabilities within time without any default. He submits that on 9.11.2020, a survey was conducted on the business premises of the petitioner and thereafter notice under Section 29 (2) of UPGST Act was issued against the petitioner asking him to appear on 27.11.2020; the petitioner moved an adjournment application but without considering the grounds taken by the petitioner, the G.S.T. regis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top