JUDGMENT

Rajeev Misra, J.

Heard Mr. Dev Prakash Singh, the learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Abhishek Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 and Mr. Ambuj Srivastava, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Achal Singh, the learned counsel representing Respondent 4.

2. At the very outset, the learned standing counsel and the learned counsel representing respondent 4 submit that present writ petition be decided finally without calling for a counter affidavit. Learned counsel for petitioner has not objection to the same. Accordingly, with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is being decided finally at the admission stage, without calling for a counter affidavit.

3. Perused the record.

4. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 31.03.2023 passed by Respondent 3, Assistant Collector/Tehsildar (Judicial), Karvi Chitrakoot in Case No. 603 of 2020 (Gaon Sabha Chakaundh v. Amrit Lal), under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) and the order dated 27.07.2023 passed by Respondent 2, Collector/District Magistrate, Chitrakoot in Appeal No. 213 of 2023 (Amrit Lal v. Gaon Sabha Chakau