SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2273

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, RAJENDRA KUMAR IV
Ambedakar Enterprisese – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Aditya Pandey.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 30.11.2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-2, Ghazipur under Section 73 (8) U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the tax period 2018-19.

3. Briefly, it is submitted that the impugned order is wholly ex parte. It has been passed denying the petitioner, opportunity of hearing. Referring to the show cause notice issued to the petitioner on 10.6.2022, it has been submitted that date for personal hearing was fixed 24.6.2022 whereas date for final reply was fixed thereafter on 9.7.2022. Then it has been submitted that though the petitioner could not appear on the date fixed for personal hearing, no other date for hearing was fixed and no order or notice was served on the petitioner. The order impugned was not passed on the date fixed but about five months thereafter on 30.11.2022.

4. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel submitted that the petitioner failed to file any reply and to make any application to submit any reply even after the due date fixed in the notice dated 10.6.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top