SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2370

SAMIT GOPAL
Sudhir Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant :Anand Prakash Dubey Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Samit Gopal, J.

List revised.

2. Heard Sri Anand Prakash Dubey, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Raj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.

3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicantSudhir Kumar with the following prayer:-

    "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and quash the entire proceeding in pursuance of the summoning order dated 21.12.2019 in Complaint Case No. 11716 of 2020, under Sections 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Kharkhauda, District Meerut pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, / Additional Civil Judge (S.D.)-8, Meerut.

    It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 11716 of 2020, under Sections 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Kharkhauda, District Meerut pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, / Additional Civil Judge (S.D.)-8, Meerut, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. And / or to pass such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top