Back
SAMIT GOPAL
Ravi Dubey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of application and complaint filed under n.i. act (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on false implication and legal debt (Para 5 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on cheque dishonor and compounding (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. directions for further proceedings and no coercive measures (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. disposal of the application (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
Samit Gopal, J.
List revised.
2. Heard Sri Dharmendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.B. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the State.
3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant- Ravi Dubey with the following prayer:-
Prima facie satisfaction for proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires no quashing unless clear abuse of process is demonstrated.
Point of Law : If the decision of the Court given in the light of the application does not conclude the proceedings against the accused and they are further required to appear and face the trial, the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
