SAMIT GOPAL
Sharad Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Samit Gopal, J.
List revised.
2. Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ankit Srivastava, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.
3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Sharad Kumar Singh with the prayer to allow this application and quash the entire proceeding as well as summoning order dated 17.02.2018 & N.B.W. order dated 09.02.2020 in Complaint Case No. 469 of 2022 (Jai Prakash v. Sharad Kumar Singh), under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Banda pending in the Court of Special Judicial Magistrate-1st, Banda with a further prayer that proceeding of the aforesaid case be stayed against the applicant during the pendency of the present application.
4. The facts of the case are that a complaint under section 138 of the N.I. Act dated 02.01.2018 was filed by the opposite party no.2 against the applicant alleging therein that cheque no.17584 dated 09.10.2017 of Rs. 82,000/- of Bank of India was given by the applicant to the opposite party no.2. The said cheque was deposited in the bank account of the complainant on 03.12.2017 which stood dishonored due
Prima facie satisfaction for proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires no quashing unless clear abuse of process is demonstrated.
Point of Law : If the decision of the Court given in the light of the application does not conclude the proceedings against the accused and they are further required to appear and face the trial, the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.