SAMIT GOPAL
Mukesh Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Samit Gopal, J.
List revised.
2. Heard Sri Ranjeet Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ankit Srivastava, learned counsel for the State and perused the records.
3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant-Mukesh Singh Yadav with the prayer to quash the Complaint Case No. 1519 of 2022 (Pushpa Shahu v. Mukesh Singh Yadav) under section 138 N.I. Act, P.S. Babina, District Jhansi including the NBW order dated 3.4.2023 and summoning order dated 24.3.2022 as well as proceeding of 82 Cr.P.C. and to stay the further proceedings of aforesaid complaint case.
4. The facts of the case are that a complaint under section 138 of the N.I. Act dated 24.2.2022 was filed by the opposite party no.2 against the applicant alleging therein that Cheque No.015062 dated 20.12.2021 of Rs. 1,00,000/-, Cheque No.015063 dated 5.1.2022 of Rs.2,00,000/- and Cheque No.015064 dated 15.1.2022 of Rs.1,00,000/- were given by the applicant to the opposite party no.2. The said cheques were deposited in the bank account of the complaint which stood dishonored with the comment 'Funds Insufficient'. The same was returned to him with a memo dated 27.1.2022. The
Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H. 2010 (5) SCC 663
M/s. Meters & Instrument Private Ltd. v. Kanchan Mehta (2018) 1 SCC 560
Point of Law : If the decision of the Court given in the light of the application does not conclude the proceedings against the accused and they are further required to appear and face the trial, the....
Prima facie satisfaction for proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires no quashing unless clear abuse of process is demonstrated.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.