IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J.
Jitendra Mishra @ Sanjay And 2 Others - Applicants
Versus
State of U.P. and Another - Opposite Party
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482 NO.38114 OF 2022.
Decided On : 06-04-2023
JUDGMENT
Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.
vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa foi{kh la[;k 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh fouksn dqekj JhokLro ,oa foi{kh la[;k 3 dh vksj ls muds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh eks0 unhe rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;d ifj'khyu fd;kA vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0 iz0 la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] okn la[;k 1288 o"kZ 2003] eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 966 o"kZ 1999] vUrxZr /kkjk 364] 147] 148] 149] 323 Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk dksrokyh Q:Z[kkckn] ftyk Q:Z[kkckn tks fo}ku eq[; U;kf;d eftLVs�V] Q:Z[kkckn ds U;k;ky; esa fopkjk/khu gS dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks mHk; i{k ds e/; gq, le>kSrki= fnukad 28&9&2022 ds vk/kkj ij fujLr fd;k tk,A vkosndx.k ,oa foi{kh la[;k 3 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd mHk; i{kksa ds e/; vkil esa lqyg le>kSrk fnukad 28&9&2022 dks gks x;k gS ftlesa ;g vafdr fd;k x;k gS fd oknh }kjk vKkr yksxksa ds fo:} izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djk;h x;h FkhA oknh us vius c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 161 ,oa 164 na0 iz0 la0 esa fdlh Hkh vfHk;qDr dk uke ugha fy;k gSA mDr le>kSrk i= esa ;g Hkh vafdr fd;k x;k gS fd mHk; i{kksa ds e/; vkilh lEca/k dkQh e/kqj gks x;s gS vkSj fdlh Hkh izdkj dk dksbZ fookn muds e/; 'ks"k ugha jgk gSA mDr le>kSrk i= dh lR;kiu izfr bl izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk layXud 4 ds :i esa vuqlayXud fd;k x;k gSA vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa foi{kh la[;k 3 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh eks0 unhe dk dFku gS fd os orZeku ekeys dk fuLrkj.k pkgrs gS vkSj bl okn dks os vkxs ugha pykuk pkgrs gS] blfy, mijksDr okn dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks vikLr dj fn;k tk,A vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Narinder Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Anr. 2014 Law Suit (SC) 202, Yogendra Yadav & Ors. State of Jharkhand & Anr, Dimpey Gujral W/o Vivek Gujral & Ors. v. Union Territory & Ors. Ikkfjr uthjksa dh vksj U;k;ky; dk /;ku vkd`"V djk;kA i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquus rFkk i=koyh ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; dh mijksDr uthjksa dk ifj'khyu djus ds i'pkr /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr izLrqr fd;k x;k ;g vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA rnuqlkj ;g vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk mijksDr of.kZr okn dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh vikLr dh tkrh gSA dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsaA
The High Court's revisional power under the CrPC is limited to ensuring legality and propriety of findings without re-evaluating evidence, emphasizing judicial restraint.
The central legal point established in this judgment is that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, and the burden of proof shifts to the defenda....
Judicial discretion allows for claims of mesne profits and user charges at the final hearing while maintaining the integrity of interlocutory orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.