Back
KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA
Prem Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Chand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Kshitij Shailendra, J.)
The Appeal
This is defendants' second appeal arising out of concurrent judgments passed by the Civil Court and the first appellate Court whereby Original Suit No. 625 of 1971 (Shri Subhash Chand and others v. Shri Jetha Nand and others) claiming a decree for cancellation of a registered sale-deed dated 23.8.1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the sale-deed') has been decreed and the Civil Appeal No. 641 of 1979 (Shri Shiv Charan Das and others v. Shri Subhash Chand and others) arising therefrom has been dismissed.
BRIEF FACTS AND PLAINT CASE
2. One Jhanda Ram (in short 'JR') had four sons namely Ram Chandra (non-party), Pyare Lal (defendant No. 3) (in short 'PL'), Khanda Ram (non-party) and Jetha Nand (in short 'JN') (defendant No. 1). JN was married to Smt. Dhanwanti Devi (in short 'DD') (defendant No. 2). JR died in the year 1959, PL died in the year 1973 and JN died in the year 1993. PL had six sons, out of whom, reference of only three is relevant. These are Prem Kumar (Defendant No. 4), Navin Kumar (defendant No. 5) and Shyam Kumar. JN (since deceased) is succeeded by his five sons Subhash Chandra and four others who are respondent Nos. 1 to 5 in
The suit for cancellation of a sale-deed was barred under Section 49 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, as plaintiffs failed to prove the existence of a Joint Hindu Family or that the propert....
The court ruled that claims of joint ownership must be substantiated with evidence, and the applicability of Section 49 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act bars civil court jurisdiction in cons....
Orders and titles obtained through fraud are nullities; rightful ownership should not be barred by procedural delays attributable to such fraud.
The court affirmed that previously established compromises governed property rights, and the misrepresentation of record by defendants did not substantiate their claims to a larger share than legally....
The court affirmed that the rights of co-tenants may be limited by previous compromises, reinforcing the principle that parties must substantiate claims against duly recorded documents.
Unregistered Wills granting limited interests do not negate partition rights unless claims about the nature of interests are timely raised during consolidation proceedings, reinforcing exclusive juri....
The principle of res judicata applies at every stage of proceedings, and once an order made in the course of a proceeding becomes final, it would be binding at the subsequent stage of the proceeding.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
