SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, DONADI RAMESH
Jyotish Chandra Thapliyal – Appellant
Versus
Deveshwari Thapliyal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Deep Chandra Joshi, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri D.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Present appeal has been filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act arising from judgment and order dated 25.9.2008 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Moradabad, whereby the learned Court below has dismissed Matrimonial Case No. 449 of 2007 (Jyotish Chandra Thapliyal Vs. Smt. Deveshwari Thapliyal).
3. Perusal of the record reveals that the divorce was sought on the ground of cruelty, set up by the appellant. According to the appellant, the respondent practised cruelty in having refused to discharge her moral duty to take care of the aged parents of the appellant. In that regard, it is the admitted case of the appellant (as recorded by the learned Court below in the impugned order) that the appellant used to live away from the respondent while serving as a police official in the State Police. Thus, the appellant nowhere stated that his aged/retired parents were living with the respondent and in that the respondent refused to take care of her in-laws. On the contrary, the appellant himself set up a case that he used to live separately f
Gananath Pattnaik Vs. State of Orissa
Jaydeep Majumdar Vs. Bharti Jaiswal Majumdar
N.G. Dastane (DR) Vs. S. Dastane
Parveen Mehta Vs. Inderjit Mehta
Pawan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana
Savitri Pandey Vs. Prem Chandra Pandey
Shobha Rani Vs. Madhukar Reddy
Vinita Saxena Vs. Pankaj Pandey
Cruelty in matrimonial law is subjective and must be assessed based on its impact on the aggrieved spouse, rather than rigid standards or expectations.
Cruelty in matrimonial law is assessed based on its impact on the aggrieved spouse, requiring a subjective evaluation of circumstances rather than a mere objective standard.
Mental cruelty can justify divorce when one spouse's conduct causes reasonable apprehension of harm to the other, as established in this case.
Cruelty in matrimonial law encompasses both physical and mental aspects, with the latter requiring a cumulative assessment of conduct that causes reasonable apprehension of harm to the aggrieved spou....
Cruelty and desertion must be proven with specific evidence; irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a statutory ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Cruelty in matrimonial law encompasses both physical and mental aspects, with the impact on the aggrieved spouse being crucial for determining divorce.
Point of Law : Matrimonial Dispute - Cruelty - None of instances of cruelty, pleaded in plaint, would amount to commission of cruelty within meaning of Section 13 of Act, 1955 nor does it satisfy the....
Divorce – Cruelty may be mental or physical – It may be intentional or unintentional – It is a matter of inference to be drawn by considering nature of conduct and its effect on complaining spouse.
Cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act encompasses both physical and mental aspects, assessed on a preponderance of evidence standard.
Matrimonial Dispute - Definition of cruelty - Any marriage solemnised, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, may, on a petition presented by either husband or wife, be dissolved by a ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.