IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, JAYANT BANERJI, JJ
Bandana – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Jayant Banerji, J.)
1. The petitioner, who is an elected member of Kshettra Panchayat constituted under the Kshettra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Act, 19611[Act, 1961] delivered in person a written notice of intention to make a motion of no confidence in the Pramukh of Kshettra Panchayat in proper form which was signed by more than half of the total number of elected members of Kshettra Panchayat i.e. 70 members out of 100 members, together with a copy of the proposed motion to the Collector, Azamgarh, who had jurisdiction over the Kshettra Panchayat. This notice of no confidence was moved on 7.3.2025 in accordance with Section15(2) of the Act, 1961.
2. The respondent no. 2 i.e. Collector/District Magistrate, Azamgarh, it is alleged, did not take any action on the notice dated 7.3.2025. Thereafter, within a period of five days on 12.3.2025, 69 members of Kshettra Panchayat allegedly filed notarized affidavit in support of Block Pramukh, enclosed with a letter of the Block Pramukh of the same date, stating that they had not participated in any meeting to propose motion of no confidence against the respondent no.3 and had not signed affidavit regarding the same. Thereafter,






Vikas Trivedi Vs. State of U.P.
Utma Devi vs. State of U.P. & Others
Smt. Sheela Devi and other Vs. State of UP and others
The Collector must convene a meeting for no confidence motions upon valid notice and cannot conduct a detailed inquiry into disputed facts.
The Collector has sole jurisdiction to assess no confidence motions without delegating authority to others and must act within statutory timelines to validate signatures.
The Collector cannot delegate authority regarding no confidence motions; decisions must be made independently, reflecting immediacy and adherence to statutory mandates.
The court established that the personal delivery requirement in Section 15(2) is directory, allowing for valid notice delivery to an alternate official.
The form of notice for a no confidence motion is directory; substantial compliance with statutory requirements suffices.
No obligation on the Collector to verify allegations in no-confidence requisition; statutory compliance is sufficient.
The Collector is obligated to convene a meeting forthwith upon receipt of a valid requisition for a no-confidence motion, without examining the veracity of the allegations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.