Siaram vs State of U.P. - 2025 Supreme(All) 2178

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(All) 2178

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Vivek Kumar Birla, Jitendra Kumar Sinha
Siaram – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.N. Mishra
For the Respondent: A.G.A

Table of Content
1. appellants convicted under ipc sections. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. prosecution's case based on eyewitness accounts. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. charges framed against accused after investigation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. arguments regarding delay and credibility of witnesses. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. court's analysis of witness credibility and evidence. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. evaluation of testimonies and their reliability. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
7. legal principles regarding intent and culpability. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
8. court's conclusion on the nature of the offense. (Para 38 , 39)
9. sentencing of appellants based on findings. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)
10. administrative directives for compliance. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)

JUDGMENT :

Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J.

1. Heard Sri Javed Alam, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellants, Sri O.P. Dwivedi, learned AGA-Ist for the State and perused the record.

2. Present Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 21.12.1985 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Budaun in Sessions Trial No. 455 of 1983 convicting and sentencing the appe