Sandeep Kumar vs State of U.P. - 2025 Supreme(All) 2735

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(All) 2735

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Sandeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Raghuraj Singh

JUDGMENT :

Deepak Verma, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 531 of 2024, under Sections 420, 406, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Auraiya, District- Auraiya, during the pendency of trial.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive; there is no evidence to prosecute the applicant. It is a civil nature dispute. Allegation alleged in the first information report is false and baseless and without support of any cogent evidence. Prima facie, no offence under alleged sections is made out against the applicant. Lastly, it is submitted that the applicant is apprehensive of imminent arrest. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he would not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate with the investigation.

4. Considered the argument raised by counsel for the applicant, the prayer of applicant is refused.

5. However, considering the Hon'ble Apex Court judgment passed in Arnesh Kumar v. S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document