SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1617

DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
Rajveer Baghel – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sanjay Kumar Bahirani, Advocate, Koushlenddra Singh Tomar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Deepak Kumar agarwal, J. - The applicant has filed this first application u/S.438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail as he has apprehension of his arrest in connection with Crime No.42/2022 registered at Police Station Jaura, District Morena for the offences punishable under Sections 420 , 272 & 273 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter. He has not committed any offence in any manner. He is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions which may be imposed by this court while considering the application for grant of anticipatory bail. Counsel for the applicant prays that the application may be allowed in terms of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar , (2014) 8 SCC 273 .

Per contra, Counsel for the State has opposed the application and prayed for rejection.

However, looking to the fact that since the offence in question attracts punishment less than 7 years and therefore, in view of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of arnesh Kumar (Supra), it is directed that in offences involving punishment upto seven years imprisonment the police may resort to the extreme step of arrest only wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top