Sundar Pal Singh vs State of U.P. - 2025 Supreme(All) 2736

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(All) 2736

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Sundar Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Pankaj Dwivedi

JUDGMENT :

Deepak Verma, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 615 of 2023, under Section 3(1)/58/72(1) U.P. Sub Mineral (Removal) Rules, 2021 and Section 4/21 Mines and Minerals (Regulation of Development) Act, 1957 and Section 379, 411 IPC, Police Station-Sikandra, District-Agra, during the pendency of trial.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Applicant's name surfaced in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused persons. Investigating Officer has submitted charge-sheet against two co- accused persons and investigation against the applicant is still pending. Applicant has criminal history of one case, which has been explained in the present anticipatory bail application. Lastly, it is submitted that the applicant is apprehensive of imminent arrest. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he would not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document