IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Sanjay Kumar Chaurasiya – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing and connection of multiple petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. interim orders and contractual obligations. (Para 3 , 4 , 10 , 18 , 21) |
| 3. submissions regarding petitioners’ rights. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. changes in employment policy and contract issues. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. funding and renewal of contracts under new policies. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. judicial review of outsourcing policies. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. contractual rights and renewal. (Para 30 , 33 , 35) |
| 8. no inherent right to contract renewal for employees. (Para 31) |
| 9. dismissal of petitions regarding state policies on outsourcing. (Para 34) |
| 10. dismissal of petitions and vacating interim orders. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT :
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.
1. Heard Sri Vikas Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties, Sri Upendra Nath Mishra, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Madhukar Ojha, learned counsel for the Chief Executive Officer, State Health Agency, Ayushman Bharat, Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojna, Hazratganj, Lucknow and Sri Satya Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel, assis
Yogesh Mahajan v. Professor R.C. Deka, Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
GRIDCO Ltd. and Another v. Sadananda Doloi and Others
Director, Institute of Management Development, U.P. v. Pushpa Srivastava
Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Contract Employees Sangh v. State of U.P. and Others
Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U.P.
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others v. Principal, Abhay Nandan Inter College and Others
Contractual employees do not have an inherent right to contract renewal; their rights depend on explicit terms. Outsourcing policies are typically non-reviewable by courts.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a writ petition by an outsourced employee against a private entity is not maintainable.
Termination of outsourced employees merged into APCOS deemed illegal; court directed continuation of services and payment of due salaries.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.