IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
AJAY BHANOT
Anand Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AJAY BHANOT, J.
1. The judgement is being structured in the following conceptual framework to facilitate the discussion:
| I | Introduction |
| II | Facts |
| III | Submissions of learned counsel for the parties |
| IV | Legal Issue |
| V | Cases in Point |
| A. Pre Paul Anthony | |
| B. Paul Anthony | |
| C. Post Paul Anthony | |
| VI | Criminal trials and departmental enquiry : General Observations |
| VII | Analysis of facts |
| VIII | Findings and Conclusions |
I. Introduction
2. The petitioner has assailed the order of suspension dated 19.12.2024 as well as the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent authorities.
II. Facts
3. The petitioner is working as Assistant-Grade III in India Government Mint, NOIDA. According to the respondents the petitioner was caught while attempting to steal 13 coins of Rs. 20 denomination on 19.12.2024 by the security personnel of the CISF who was on duty at the relevant point in time. For the aforesaid act of attempted theft an FIR was lodged by one Harpal Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, CISF which came to be registered as Case Crime No. 0561 of 2024 at Police Station- Phase I, NOIDA on 20.12.2024 at 2.02 AM.
4. The investigation has concluded and the chargesheet has been filed before the trial court
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd. vs. Kushal Bhan
Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. v. Workmen
Jang Bahadur Singh v. Brij Nath Tiwari
Kusheshwar Dubey v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.
State of Rajasthan v. B.K. Meena and Others
Depot Manager, A.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Mohd. Yousuf Miya and Ors.
Capt. M. Paul Anthony v. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. & Anr.
G.M. Tank v. State of Gujarat and Ors.
The Divisional Controller, KSRTC v. M.G. Vittal Rao
State of Rajasthan and Ors. vs. Phool Singh
Eastern Coalfields Limited and Ors. v. Rabindra Kumar Bharti
Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited v. C. Nagaraju and Ors.
Shashi Bhusan Prasad v. Inspector General Central Industrial Security Force and Ors.
Baljinder Pal Kaur vs. State of Punjab and Ors.
Stanzen Toyotetsu India P. Ltd. vs. Girish V. and Ors.
The Deputy Inspector General of Police and Ors. v. S. Samuthiram
Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank and Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.