Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SAMIT GOPAL
Alok Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of cases before the court. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural details and prior bail applications. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. court's ongoing observations on trial delays. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments presented by parties. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 22 , 30) |
| 5. judicial reasoning concerning evidence and charges. (Para 13 , 19 , 24 , 36 , 42) |
| 6. final directives on bail. (Para 14 , 40 , 46) |
| 7. factual narrative detailing the events leading to charges. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 8. court's analysis on the conduct of trial. (Para 17 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT :
SAMIT GOPAL, J.
1. Heard Sri Raja Chaudhary, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Narendra Kumar along with Sri Narendra Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.32305 of 2025 & Criminal Misc. Application U/S 482 No.1569 of 2025 ( Alok Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another ), Sri Preet Pal Singh Rathore, learned counsel for the applicant in Application U/S 528 BNSS No.8780 of 2025 ( Vishal Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. and another ) and Sri Karunesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant in Application U/s 528 Bnss No. 18833 of 2025 ( Prachand Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another ) and Sri Biren
The court emphasized that bail considerations hinge on the nature of evidence, trial stage, and parity with co-accused, enabling release under strict conditions to uphold justice.
A second petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings was deemed non-maintainable under Section 482 due to the lack of new grounds or circumstances, with emphasis on ensuring full judicial trial fo....
Though accused has right to make successive applications for grant of bail, court entertaining such subsequent bail applications has a duty to consider reasons and grounds on which earlier bail appli....
Unexplained delays in lodging FIRs can undermine the prosecution's case, leading to quashing of charges.
Anticipatory bail granted in PMLA case due to agency's sudden coercive action post-arrest of its IO for bribery, prior cooperation shown, no custodial necessity evidenced, twin conditions under Sec 4....
The applicant, who concealed facts and filed a false affidavit, and made a mockery of the orders of the lower court by avoiding the process of summon, bailable warrant, non-bailable warrant, and the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
