SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1668

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Rajnish Bansal - Applicant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement - Respondent
CrMP (M) No. : 2084 of 2025
Decided On : 25-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Ms. Swati Sharma, Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Mr. Ajeet Singh Saklani, Advocates (through Video Conferencing), Mr. Surila Sangam, Ms. Ananya Srivastava, Advocates

Anticipatory bail granted in PMLA case due to agency's sudden coercive action post-arrest of its IO for bribery, prior cooperation shown, no custodial necessity evidenced, twin conditions under Sec 45 satisfied.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 4, 17, 19, 45, 50 - Anticipatory bail in money laundering case - Application under Section 482 BNSS for pre-arrest bail in ECIR based on predicate offence involving fraudulent scholarship claims - Applicant, chairman of professional institutions, cooperated with investigation from 2019 till early 2025, statements recorded under Section 50 PMLA on multiple occasions - Sudden issuance of short-notice summons and search after arrest of investigating officer in bribery case against him, leading to application for non-bailable warrants - No specific material produced justifying custodial interrogation or non-cooperation - Twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA satisfied as reasonable grounds exist to believe applicant not guilty and unlikely to commit offence on bail - Proceedings for declaring proclaimed offender pending but application maintainable as not yet declared - Direction issued for release on bail in event of arrest with conditions. (Paras 94-160)

(B) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 45 - Bail conditions - Stringent twin conditions apply but not to deny liberty where no custodial necessity shown, prior cooperation demonstrated, and agency action appears retaliatory post-arrest of its officer - Grant of bail in predicate offence does not entitle to PMLA bail but rigors apply independently; however, long pendency without coercion weighs in favour. (Paras 145-154)

(C) Investigation - Malafides - Unholy haste in coercive steps after exposure of investigating officer's bribery demand indicates vengeance rather than investigation needs - Agency must justify sudden activity after years of dormancy; mere evasive replies to summons not ground for arrest without recorded reasons to believe guilt. (Paras 101-116, 124-128)

Facts of the case:
Applicant apprehends arrest in ECIR registered in 2019 based on CBI-investigated predicate offence of cheating and forgery in scholarship scheme for disadvantaged students - Institutions submitted bogus claims generating proceeds of crime - Applicant and brother arrested by CBI in 2022, granted bail - ED conducted searches in 2023, 2025; statements recorded till Dec 2024 - After applicant reported bribe demand by ED officer leading to his arrest by CBI, ED issued rapid summons, brother arrested, NBWs sought and issued ex parte, PO proceedings initiated - Prior anticipatory bail by Special Judge dismissed.

Findings of Court:
Applicant entitled to pre-arrest bail; sudden agency activation post-officer arrest smacks of malafide; no material for custodial need; twin conditions met.

Issues: Maintainability of anticipatory bail amid pending proclaimed offender proceedings; validity of sudden coercive measures post-arrest of agency officer; satisfaction of Section 45 PMLA twin conditions given prior cooperation and ongoing investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: Anticipatory bail maintainable if not yet declared proclaimed offender (paras 95-100); retaliatory haste invalidates agency actions without justifying material (paras 101-143); no compulsion to confess or face custody for non-cooperation (paras 137-138); bail object is liberty pending trial, not punishment (para 133).

Result: Application allowed; applicant released on bail in event of arrest on furnishing bonds of Rs.2,00,000/- with sureties, subject to conditions including joining investigation, not leaving jurisdiction, no witness tampering.

Table of Content
1. ecir registration based on predicate cbi fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. ed searches, cooperation, io corruption case. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 27 , 28)
3. summons disputes, nbws issuance, arrests. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
4. ed allegations of fraud, non-cooperation. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 84)
5. counsel arguments on malafides, precedents. (Para 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93)
6. maintainability despite po proceedings. (Para 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100)
7. malafides post-io arrest, hasty actions. (Para 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122)
8. arrest requires recorded reasons. (Para 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131)
9. non-confession not non-cooperation. (Para 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140)
10. twin conditions satisfied for bail. (Para 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156)
11. anticipatory bail granted with conditions. (Para 157 , 158 , 159 , 160)

JUDGMENT :

Virender Singh, J.

Applicant-Rajnish Bansal has filed the present application, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), as, he is apprehending his arrest in case, registered vide ECIR No. SHSZO/04/2019, dated 19th July, 2019, with Sub-Zonal Office, Directorate of Enforcement, Shimla (hereinafter referred to as ‘ED’), under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ‘PMLA’).

2. By way of the present application, the indulgence of this Court has been sought to direct the ED to release the applicant on bail, in the event of his arrest, in the afore-stated case.

3. The relief has been sought on the ground that the ECIR has been registered by the ED, on the basis of source information, contained in case FIR No. 133/2018, registered under Sections 409, 419, 465, 466 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’), with Police Station East, Shimla, H.P. The investigation of the same is stated to have, thereafter, been transferred to CBI, vide notification No. Home (A) A (9) 31/2018, dated 20th March, 2019 and, subsequently, RC No. 0962019S0002, dated 7th May, 2019, was registered with CBI/ACB, Shimla, under Sections 409, 419, 465, 466 and 471 IPC.

4. It is the further case of the applicant that since Sections 419 and 471 IPC were the Scheduled Offences, as defined under the PMLA, in both the FIRs, the ECIR was registered by the ED.

5. As per the further case of the applicant, after the registration of the case, i.e. RC No. 0962019S0002, CBI conducted searches and seizures at 22 private institutions, including Himalayan Group of Professional Institutions and Apex Group of Professional Institutions, which had applied for and received Post Matric Scholarship Scheme for SC, ST and OBC students of Himachal Pradesh. The applicant is stated to be the Chairman of Himalayan Group of Professional Institutions, Kala Amb, Sirmaur and Apex Group of Professional Institute, whereas, his brother Vikas Bansal is the Vice President of these institutions. The applicant and his brother are stated to be the trustees of Maa Saraswati Educational Trust and People Welfare Educational Trust. The Himalayan Group of Professional Institution, Kala Amb, Sirmaur, H.P., has been operating under Maa Saraswati Educational Trust, whereas, Apex Group of Professional Institute is running under People Welfare Educational Trust.

6. According to the applicant, the CBI had arrested him on 8th April, 2022, during the course of the investigation, in the aforesaid FIR and was released on bail







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top