IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH
Rajnish Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ecir registration based on predicate cbi fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. ed searches, cooperation, io corruption case. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 27 , 28) |
| 3. summons disputes, nbws issuance, arrests. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. ed allegations of fraud, non-cooperation. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 84) |
| 5. counsel arguments on malafides, precedents. (Para 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93) |
| 6. maintainability despite po proceedings. (Para 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100) |
| 7. malafides post-io arrest, hasty actions. (Para 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122) |
| 8. arrest requires recorded reasons. (Para 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131) |
| 9. non-confession not non-cooperation. (Para 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140) |
| 10. twin conditions satisfied for bail |
Suraj Seth versus Assistant Director, Directorate Enforcement Jalandhar
Ramji Singh versus Directorate of Enforcement Allahabad Sub Zonal Office
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc versus State of Punjab
Subhash Papatlal Dave versus Union of India & Anr.
P. Chidambaram versus Directorate of Enforcement
Union of India versus Varinder Singh
State of Maharashtra versus Ishwar Piraji Kalpatri
Siddharth versus State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Anticipatory bail granted in PMLA case due to agency's sudden coercive action post-arrest of its IO for bribery, prior cooperation shown, no custodial necessity evidenced, twin conditions under Sec 4....
Compliance with Section 19 of PMLA and satisfaction of twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA are crucial for determining the validity of arrest and granting bail.
The court emphasized that in economic offences, especially under the PMLA, bail should not be granted unless the accused demonstrates they are not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for strict compliance with the mandatory provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in the arrest and bail application pr....
PMLA Section 45 twin conditions relaxable by constitutional courts where voluminous evidence delays trial unreasonably, prolonged custody violates Article 21 speedy trial right, ensuring bail despite....
The court emphasized that in economic offences under the PMLA, bail is not granted unless the accused proves they are not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences.
In PMLA cases, constitutional courts grant bail despite Section 45 twin conditions if prolonged incarceration (over two years), trial delay not attributable to accused, and no reasonable trial conclu....
The court granted bail under the PMLA, emphasizing the lack of sufficient evidence linking the applicant to money laundering, and highlighting the necessity for a predicate offence to substantiate ch....
The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 as there were no reasonable grounds for believing that she had committed an off....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.