SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 95

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PRAKASH PADIA, J.
Chanda Devi – Petitioners
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others – Respondents
WRIT C No. 1800 of 2026
Decided On : 12-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Brijesh Kumar Prajapati, Mahesh Kumar, Maheshwari Prasad Srivastava, Surendra Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

Mandamus cannot be issued against private individuals; aggrieved parties must seek remedies through common law rather than writ jurisdiction.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Writ Jurisdiction - Mandamus cannot be issued against private individuals; an aggrieved party should resort to common law remedies. (Paras 2, 3, 4)

(B) The petitioner sought directions against respondents to remove encroachment over property, which falls outside writ jurisdiction.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to direct respondents to remove encroachments on specific land within stipulated time.

Findings of Court:
Relief against private individuals cannot be granted under writ jurisdiction; appropriate remedy lies under common law.

Issues: Whether mandamus can be issued against private individuals and appropriateness of writ jurisdiction for encroachment disputes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that a writ petition cannot be used to seek relief against private parties, emphasizing the established legal principle regarding private encroachments.

Result: Petition dismissed with liberty to pursue common law remedy.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks relief for encroachment. (Para 1)
JUDGMENT :

PRAKASH PADIA, J.

1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to direct the respondents specially Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 4 to demarcate and remove the encroachment made by the Respondent No.5 over the and in dispute, arazi no.640/0.025 hectares situated in village Kalyanpur, Police Station Jafrabad, Pargana Jafrabad Tehsil Sadar, District Jaunpur within stipulated period.
2. Learned Standing Counsel as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of Gaon Sabha submit that if the petitioner is aggrieved against private individuals then the proper course open for him is to apply for common law remedy.
3. From perusal of the record, it is clear that the petitioner wants relief against the private individuals which cannot be granted under writ jurisdiction. Law in this connection is well settled that mandamus cannot be issued against the private individuals and the appropriate remedy lies under the common law.
4. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed with the liberty to avail the common law remedy, if so advised.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top