IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Kuldeep Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Respondents
Application U/s 528 BNSS No. 35779 of 2025
Decided On : 13-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of allegations and relationships. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments regarding consent and nature of relationship. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. analysis of legal standards regarding consent and deceit. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. conclusion denying the application to quash. (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT :
AVNISH SAXENA, J.
1. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been moved by the accused-applicant to quash the charge sheet dated 08.08.2025, the cognizance order dated 26.08.2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh and the proceedings in trial of Case No. 2823/2025 ( State Vs. Kuldeep ) arising out of Case Crime No. 521/2025, Police Station-Quarsi, District-Aligarh for the offences in Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 under Sections, 69 (Sexual intercourse by employing deceitful means), 115(2) (Voluntarily causing hurt), 352 (Intentional insult with the intent to provoke breach of peace) and 351(3) (Criminal Intimidation).
2. Heard Shri Mritunjay Dwivedi, learned counsel for applicant, Ms. Akansha Gaur, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Shri Raj Baran, learned A.G.A. for State. Perused the record.
3. The opposite party no. 2 (Victim) has lodged the FIR on 20.06.2025 at 23:56 hours against the accused-applicant with the allegation that the victim is residing in the house of accused-applicant and in relations with the accused-applicant since last 11 years, during this period accused-applicant has entered into sexual intercourse with the victim on making false promise of marriage. He also violently hurt her by kicks and fist while entering into sexual intercourse. He also threatened the victim not to open her mouth otherwise he would defame her. The accused-applicant kept the victim as his wife. On 27.05.2025 at about 9:00 p.m., the accused-applicant has beaten the victim due to which she suffered knee injury. She has given a written information at the police station concerned on which the accused-applicant has entered into a written compromise and ready to keep the victim with him but after leaving the police station, he again stated not to keep her with him as she is suffering from ‘Rasauli’ (Uterine Fibroids) and further threatened to implicate her and her family members in false cases and hurl abuses.
4. With the above allegations the F.I.R. has been registered for the offences under Sections 69, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of B.N.S.
5. In the statement recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S., the victim has stated that she is 39 years of age. Since 2014-15 the victim is in relations with the accused-applicant. Many a times the accused-applicant has promised her to marry and entered into sexual intercourse, but whenever she asked to talk to the family, he ignores the talk of marriage on the pretext of ill health of his parents and marriage of his sister. She became mentally disturbed and while she was suffering with ‘Rasauli’ the accused-applicant refused to get her treated in hospital. She has reiterated the incident of 27.05.2025 and the threatening.
6. In her statement under Section 183 B.N.S.S., she has stated that for the first time she was raped by the accused-applicant after she was administered with sedative cold drink, thereafter entered in sexual intercourse on false promise of marriage. She did her Ph.D. while residing alongwith applicant in his house. In the year 2017-18 she has married the applicant at a temple where he put vermilion on her head. Two years back, he has also got her signature on the certificate of marriage of Aarya Samaj Mandir. Further stated that Rs. 15 lakh has been given by her mother to the accused-applicant and has again asked for Rs. 10 lakh. Further stated that once accused-applicant taken the victim to Bateshwar, but while returning he has left her alone on the road. On 18.06.2025, he has filed frivolous case, although on 17.06.2025 they underwent compromise.
7. On these allegations and material the charge sheet is submitted

The court determined that allegations involving false promise of marriage and deceit necessitate a trial, given the complexities of consent in a long-term relationship.
Consent obtained through deceitful promises, particularly regarding marriage, is invalid and subjects the accused to criminal liability under recent legislative provisions.
Long-term consensual relationships can negate claims of false promise of marriage unless clear evidence of bad faith is presented.
The court emphasized that continuous consensual relationships should not lead to criminal charges of rape unless compelling evidence of deception is established, reflecting the need to distinguish be....
Prolonged consensual relationships do not constitute rape due to non-fulfillment of marriage promises unless coercion is evident; criminal proceedings are misused if initiated post-breakup.
Consent from a minor is legally invalid, and allegations of sexual intercourse under false pretenses warrant legal scrutiny, confirming the applicability of relevant statutory provisions.
Consent to sexual intercourse vitiated if false promise of marriage given in bad faith from inception with direct nexus to the act, distinguishing from mere subsequent breach, warranting refusal to q....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.