Back
VIPIN SANGHI
Arvind Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh.
2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed.
The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file afresh.
The court allows the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies.
The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Writ Petition, and the court granted the request.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition upon application by the petitioner.
The court has the discretion to dismiss a writ petition if the petitioner seeks to withdraw it.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
Permission to withdraw petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
A petitioner can withdraw a writ petition with liberty to refile, which is recognized and allowed by the court.
The court has discretion to allow withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to refile, which was granted in this case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
