Back
VIPIN SANGHI, ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Narendra Kumar Pant – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - The petitioner has moved an Application (IA No. 15667 of 2023) seeking leave to withdraw the present writ petition.
2. The Application seeking leave to withdraw the present writ petition is allowed. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition upon application by the petitioner.
The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Writ Petition, and the court granted the request.
The court allows the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies.
The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file afresh.
The court has the discretion to dismiss a writ petition if the petitioner seeks to withdraw it.
The court's decision was based on the settlement reached by the parties.
The court's acceptance of the petitioners' withdrawal led to the dismissal of the writ petition and pending applications.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition in the interest of justice.
A petitioner has the liberty to withdraw a writ petition filed before the Court at their discretion, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
