SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 137

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, Alok Kumar Verma, JJ.
Narendra Kumar Pant - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (SB) No. 477 of 2018
Decided On : 12-01-2023

Important Points

The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition.

Subject

Civil Law - Writ Petitions

Headnote

Withdrawal of Writ Petition - Dismissal of Writ Petition - The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, leading to its dismissal.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, leading to its dismissal.

Issues: Application for withdrawal of writ petition

Ratio Decidendi: The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Advocates appeared:
Subhash Upadhyay, Advocate, Pradeep Joshi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - The petitioner has moved an Application (IA No. 15667 of 2023) seeking leave to withdraw the present writ petition.

2. The Application seeking leave to withdraw the present writ petition is allowed. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

3. Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top