Back
VIPIN SANGHI, MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Naveen Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to pursue such other remedy as may be available to the petitioner.
2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed.
The court allows the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies.
The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file afresh.
The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Writ Petition, and the court granted the request.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition.
The court has the discretion to dismiss a writ petition if the petitioner seeks to withdraw it.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition upon application by the petitioner.
The court maintains the discretionary power to allow a petitioner to withdraw a writ petition with the liberty to initiate fresh proceedings if the circumstances justify doing so.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek administrative remedies.
Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition without prejudice to file fresh petition.
A petitioner has the liberty to withdraw a writ petition filed before the Court at their discretion, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
