SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 111

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, JJ.
Khalid - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 138 of 2021
Decided On : 03-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mohd. Alauddin, Advocate, K.N. Joshi, Advocate, Ahrar Baig, Advocate

The court has the discretion to dismiss a writ petition if the petitioner seeks to withdraw it.

Headnote:

Dismissal - Writ Petition - The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, leading to the dismissal of any pending applications.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, resulting in its dismissal along with any pending applications.

Issues: Withdrawal of writ petition and dismissal of pending applications.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and any pending applications were also dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - After some arguments, Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

3. Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top