SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 111

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, JJ.
Khalid - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 138 of 2021
Decided On : 03-01-2023

Important Points

The court has the discretion to dismiss a writ petition if the petitioner seeks to withdraw it.

Subject

Civil Law - Writ Petitions

Headnote

Dismissal - Writ Petition - The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, leading to the dismissal of any pending applications.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, resulting in its dismissal along with any pending applications.

Issues: Withdrawal of writ petition and dismissal of pending applications.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and any pending applications were also dismissed.

Advocates appeared:
Mohd. Alauddin, Advocate, K.N. Joshi, Advocate, Ahrar Baig, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - After some arguments, Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

3. Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top