Back
VIPIN SANGHI, MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Khalid – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - After some arguments, Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
The court has the discretion to dismiss a writ petition if the petitioner seeks to withdraw it.
The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Writ Petition, and the court granted the request.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition.
The court allows the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies.
The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file afresh.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition upon application by the petitioner.
A petitioner has the liberty to withdraw a writ petition filed before the Court at their discretion, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of writ petitions is permissible when requested by the petitioner, affirming party autonomy in legal actions.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition in the interest of justice.
The court emphasized the right to withdraw a writ petition voluntarily, confirming that such requests can be permitted under law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
