Back
VIPIN SANGHI, ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Vijay Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
2. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Writ Petition, and the court granted the request.
The court allows the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition.
The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file afresh.
The court has the discretion to dismiss a writ petition if the petitioner seeks to withdraw it.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition upon application by the petitioner.
A writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner seeks such permission from the court.
A petitioner has the liberty to withdraw a writ petition filed before the Court at their discretion, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn.
The court accepted the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition, leading to its dismissal.
A petitioner has the right to withdraw their application at any stage, leading to dismissal of the writ petition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
