SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 151

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, CJ.
Siddhartha Balodi - Appellant
Versus
Latasha Barshilia - Respondent
Transfer Application No. 21 of 2020
Decided On : 10-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Priyanshu Gairola, Advocate, Paritosh Dalakoti, Advocate

The court can dismiss an application as infructuous if the parties have obtained divorce by mutual consent.

Headnote:

Infructuous - Divorce by Mutual Consent - The court dismissed the application as infructuous due to the parties obtaining divorce by mutual consent.

Fact of the Case:

The present application became infructuous as the parties obtained divorce by mutual consent.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the present application as infructuous due to the parties' mutual consent divorce.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the parties had obtained divorce by mutual consent.

Final Decision: The present application was dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - Learned counsel for the applicant states that the present application has become infructuous, since the parties have arrived at settlement. The parties have obtained divorce by mutual consent.

2. Accordingly, the present C-24 application is dismissed as infructuous.

3. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top