SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 153

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, CJ.
Yogesh Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Transfer Application No. 16 of 2020
Decided On : 10-01-2023

Important Points

The court has the discretion to dismiss an application as withdrawn if the applicant does not press the application.

Subject

Civil Law - Application Withdrawal

Headnote

Withdrawal of Application - Dismissal of Application - The court dismissed the application as withdrawn after the applicant did not press the application in view of the stand taken by the respondents.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant did not press the present application after the stand taken by the respondents.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the present application as withdrawn.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the applicant not pressing the application in view of the stand taken by the respondents.

Final Decision: The present C-407 application is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

Advocates appeared:
Mohit Kumar, Advocate, J.S. Virk, Advocate, R.K. Joshi, Advocate, Anant Dhaka, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - After some arguments, in view of the stand taken by respondents, learned counsel for the applicant does not press the present application.

2. The present C-407 application is dismissed as withdrawn.

3. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top