SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 153

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, CJ.
Yogesh Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Transfer Application No. 16 of 2020
Decided On : 10-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mohit Kumar, Advocate, J.S. Virk, Advocate, R.K. Joshi, Advocate, Anant Dhaka, Advocate

The court has the discretion to dismiss an application as withdrawn if the applicant does not press the application.

Headnote:

Withdrawal of Application - Dismissal of Application - The court dismissed the application as withdrawn after the applicant did not press the application in view of the stand taken by the respondents.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant did not press the present application after the stand taken by the respondents.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the present application as withdrawn.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the applicant not pressing the application in view of the stand taken by the respondents.

Final Decision: The present C-407 application is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - After some arguments, in view of the stand taken by respondents, learned counsel for the applicant does not press the present application.

2. The present C-407 application is dismissed as withdrawn.

3. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top