SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 86

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, JJ.
Swati Punj Alias Swati Dhingra & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Tanuj Dhingra - Respondent
Appeal Against Order No. 473 of 2022
Decided On : 06-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Arvind Vashistha, Advocate, Vivek Pathak, Advocate

An appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn if the appellants realize it is not maintainable.

Headnote:

Withdrawal of Appeal - Appeal - The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after the appellants realized it was not maintainable.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants sought to withdraw the appeal as they realized it was not maintainable.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

Issues: The maintainability of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellants realized that the appeal was not maintainable.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - Learned Senior Counsel for the appellants seeks leave to withdraw the appeal, since the appellants have realised that the present appeal is not maintainable.

2. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

3. The appellants to take such other suitable action as may be permissible under law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top