Back
RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Dinesh Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common question of law in multiple petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background details of land acquisition and alleged fraud. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. arguments against returning the complaint. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. jurisdictional arguments regarding separate complaints. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. legal framework for complaints and cognizance. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. court analysis regarding the merits of complaints. (Para 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 7. final judgment dismissing all petitions. (Para 102 , 103) |
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
1. Since a common question of law is involved in all these petitions, they are being decided by this common judgment.
2. The Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India (“the complainant”) filed a complaint against all the petitioners and some other persons in the court of Special Judge (PMLA)/Sessions Judge, Dehradun, based on which, the Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 454 of 2021, Directorate of Enforcement vs. Dinesh Pratap Singh and others (“the case”) was instituted. On 28.04.2022, the court observed that all the ac
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
