Pawandeep Singh vs State of Uttarakhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(UK) 325

ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Pawandeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, Mr. B.S. Koranga, Advocate, Mr. Basant Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Alok Kumar Verma, J.

The present application has been filed by the applicants, namely, Pawandeep Singh, Smt. Mandeep Kaur, Gurdeep Singh, Preetpal Singh and Smt. Ishnit Kaur under Sections 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.9172 of 2018, “State vs. Pawandeep Singh and Others”, pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate/Ist Additional Civil Judge, Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 498A, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. Heard Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the applicants through Video Conferencing, Mr. B.S. Koranga, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Basant Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2/informant/victim and Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. The applicant no.1 is the husband of the respondent no.2 and the remaining applicants are the family members of the applicant no.1.

4. All the applicants are present through Video Conferencing. They are identified by Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate. Smt. Gurpal Kaur, the respondent no.2, is present through Video Conferencing and she is identified by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document