IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Arun Arora Alias Annu & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Anr. - Respondents
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 85 of 2023
Decided On : 13-01-2023
Section 482 - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Matrimonial Disputes
Fact of the Case:
The applicants filed an application to quash the charge-sheet and summoning order for offences under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties involved had resolved their matrimonial disputes and filed a Compounding Application.
Finding of the Court:
The court, considering the resolution of disputes and the free will of the parties, quashed the entire proceedings of the criminal case.
Issues: Matrimonial disputes, Compounding Application, Quashing of Criminal Proceedings
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in cases of resolved matrimonial disputes and mutual consent, quashing of criminal proceedings would serve the ends of justice.
Final Decision: The charge-sheet, summoning order, and entire proceedings of the criminal case were quashed, and the application under Section 482 of the CrPC was disposed of accordingly.
JUDGMENT
Alok Kumar Verma, J. - The present application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the charge-sheet dated 19.08.2021, summoning order dated 02.04.2022 along with entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2422 of 2022, 'State vs. Arun Arora alias Annu and Others', pending before the Court of Ist Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
2. Heard Mr. D.N. Sharma with Mrs. Manju Bahuguna, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. T.C. Agarwal, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mrs. Lata Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State and Mr. J.P. Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.2.
3. Mr. D.N. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants submitted that all the applicants - accused persons, namely Arun Arora alias Annu, husband of the respondent no.2, Abhishek Arora and Bhuwnesh Kumar are present in-person before the Court. They are identified by Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate.
4. Mr. J.P. Pandey, Advocate submitted that respondent no.2 - Smt. Megha, informant and victim is present in-person before this Court. She is identified by Mr. J.P. Pandey, Advocate.
5. Respondent no.2 and all the applicants submitted that there were matrimonial disputes between them and they have resolved their disputes. After resolving their disputes, they have filed a Compounding Application (IA No.1 of 2023) along with their affidavits with their free will and without any pressure.
6. The respondent no.2 further submitted that she does not want to proceed with the said criminal case.
7. Learned counsel for the State submitted that there were matrimonial disputes between the parties and they have resolved their disputes, therefore, the State has no objection.
8. Keeping in view of the totality of the fact and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that ends of justice would be met, if the charge-sheet dated 19.08.2021, summoning order dated 02.04.2022 along with entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2422 of 2022, 'State vs. Arun Arora alias Annu and Others', pending before the Court of Ist Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, are quashed.
9. Resultantly, the charge-sheet dated 19.08.2021, summoning order dated 02.04.2022 along with entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2422 of 2022, 'State vs. Arun Arora alias Annu and Others', pending before the Court of Ist Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, are quashed.
10. The Criminal Misc. Application (No.85 of 2023), filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is disposed of accordingly.
AI
Quashing of criminal proceedings in cases of resolved matrimonial disputes and mutual consent.
The resolution of matrimonial disputes and mutual compounding application can be considered as grounds for quashing criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The settlement between the parties and the joint Compounding Application can be considered for quashing criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The duty of the courts to encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes and the applicability of Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in allowing the quashing of criminal proceedings....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the power to quash criminal proceedings under Sec. 482 of Cr.P.C if the offences are individual and personal in nature, not affe....
Compromise between parties in marital disputes can result in quashing of criminal proceedings, emphasizing the need to avoid abuse of the judicial process.
The power under Section 482 Cr. P. C. can be exercised when the allegations do not prima facie constitute any offence or the FIR and evidence collected do not disclose the commission of any offence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.