Gurjeet Singh vs State of Uttarakhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(UK) 493

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Gurjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Revisionist :Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate alongwith Mr. Basant Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Deepak Bisht, Deputy Advocate General alongwith Ms. Mamta Joshi

JUDGMENT :

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 19.02.2013, passed by 3rd Additional District Judge/Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2008 Gurjeet Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand, whereby the appeal filed by the revisionist/accused was dismissed and the judgment and order dated 26.02.2008 passed by learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Khatima, Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Case No.449 of 2006(98) State Vs. Gurjeet Singh, whereby, the conviction of revisionist/ accused was modified only from 420 IPC to 420/511 IPC, rest of the part of conviction was affirmed and modified as under:-

S. No.	Conviction	Sentence	Fine	Sentence in-lieu of fine
1.	420/511 IPC	Six months’ R.I.	Rs.1,500/-	2 months’ additional S.I.
2.	468 IPC	One years’ R.I.	Rs.1,500/-	2 months’ additional S.I.
3.	471 IPC	One years’ R.I.	Rs.1,500/-	2 months’ additional S.I.

Aforesaid sentences were directed to run concurrently.

3. The facts of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(UK) 493

PANKAJ PUROHITGurjeet Singh – AppellantVersusState of Uttarakhand – Respondent

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Gurjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent