Rohit vs State of Uttarakhand - 2024 Supreme(UK) 44

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 44

ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Rohit – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.C. Petshali.
For the Respondents: Kuldeep Singh Rawat, Rakesh Negi, Yogesh Upadhaya.

JUDGMENT :

ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.

1. The present Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the applicants-accused to quash the charge-sheet dated 18.06.2019, cognizance order dated 03.08.2019 and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 3532 of 2019, State vs. Rohit and Another pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/IIIrd Additional Civil Judge, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar under Sections 380, 411, 504 and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Today, before the National Lok Adalat, the applicants-accused are present through video conferencing. They are identified by Mr. P.C. Petshali, Advocate.

3. Respondent no. 2/informant/victim-Pawan Kumar is present through video conferencing. He is identified by Mr. Yogesh Upadhaya, Advocate.

4. Both, the applicants and respondent no. 2 submitted that there were private disputes between them, and after resolving their disputes, they have filed a Compromise Application today. A Compounding Application along with their affidavits are on record.

5. Both the parties submitted that they have filed the Compounding Application and the Compromise Application with their

Click Here to Read the rest of this document