SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(UK) 16

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PANCHAL RANJAN – Appellant
Versus
SHIVANI – Respondent


Table of Content
1. initial proceedings under section 125 crpc. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. appeal and context of delays. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments for revisionist challenging ex parte judgment. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. arguments for respondent opposing revisions. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
5. court's observations on due process and fairness. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
6. court's decision on remanding for fresh adjudication. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
7. final order and directions for family court. (Para 32)

JUDGMENT :

Ashish Naithani, J.

1. Both Criminal Revision No. 483 of 2024 and Criminal Revision No. 536 of 2024 arise out of proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure initiated by the Respondent–wife before the Family Court, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun.

2. The Respondent–wife filed an application under Section 125 CrPC on 06.09.2023, registered as Misc. Criminal Case No. 274 of 2023. Summons in the said proceedings were received by the father of the Revisionist on 15.09.2023. The matter was posted for appearance on05.10.2023.

3. The Revisionist is employed as a Constable (Fire) with the CISF and was posted in Tamil Nadu during the relev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top