SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(UK) 226

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
ALOK MAHRA
Dheeraj Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Tapan Singh
For the Respondents: Dinesh Chauhan, Divya Jain

JUDGMENT :

ALOK MAHRA, J.

1. Both the criminal revisions arise out of the same judgment and order dated 16.07.2022, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Haridwar, District Haridwar in O.S. No. 161 of 2017, whereby the application filed by the minor children under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) was partly allowed and the father was directed to pay maintenance of Rs.6,500/- per month to each of the two minor children. Since both the revisions emanate from the same impugned order, they are being decided by this common judgment.

2. Criminal Revision No. 626 of 2022 has been preferred by the father, Dheeraj Kapoor, seeking setting aside of the impugned order on the ground that the learned Family Court has erred in law and on facts in awarding maintenance beyond his financial capacity and without properly considering the income of the mother. Criminal Revision No. 629 of 2022 has been filed by the minor children through their mother, seeking enhancement of the amount of maintenance awarded by the Family Court.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between Dheeraj Kapoor and Poonam Kapoor was solemnized on 17.04.2009 according to Hindu rites and r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top