SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(MP) 569

M.D.BHATT, C.P.SEN
PIRBUX – Appellant
Versus
BABULAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.JAISWAL, R.P.TIWARI

C. P. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE learned single Judge has referred the following two questions for decision by a larger Bench with a request to hear and decide the revision itself :- (1) Whether the applicant-plaintiff has acquired any vested right to file a revision in this Court under S. 115, C. P. C. on the date of filing the present suit ? (2) If the answer to question No. 1 is in the affirmative, whether the present revision in this Court is unaffected by the amendment of S. 115, C. P. C. by amending Act. No. 29 of 1984 ?this Order will also dispose of Civil Revisions Nos. 1460/84, Bhailal v. Ramakant @ Soukhilal, 103/85, Shankerlal v. Illahi; 204/85, Ramniwas Gupta and others v. Jamnadas and another; 277/85, Sanjeev Jain v. Balkrishna Agarwal and others, 289/85, Bharatlal Seth v. Municipal Council, Maharajpur; 354/85, Ramchani and others v. Ram Prasad Tiwari and 458/85, Smt. Ramsakhbai and another v. Santosh Kumar in which cases also the aforesaid questions have been referred to the larger Bench. This order will also dispose of Civil Revision No. 864/84, Ramnarayan and another v. Mahila Mohani Bai of the Gwalior Bench in which reference has been made because in an earlier order passed










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top