SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 876

S.C.PANDEY
RAM SHIROMANI MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
SHIV MOHAN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.P.Mishra, R.P.AGRAWAL

S. C. PANDEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 22-9-1995, passed by IIIrd Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satna in M. J. C. No. 28/95. The disposal of this revision shall also govern the disposal of two connected revisions, Civil Revision Nos. l848/96 and 1849/ 96.

( 2 ) THE applicant filed three applications supported by affidavits of even number for setting aside three ex parte awards dated 4-7-1984, passed against him in favour of the non-applicants in Claims Tribunal Cases No. 126/89, 131/89 and 127/89 respectively. The case of the applicant was that none of the summons in above three cases was served upon him. Therefore, he was unaware about pendency of any claim against him. For this reason he remained absent and three ex parte awards, dated 4-7-1994, were passed against him in his utter ignorance. He received notices for appearance before the Tribunal in respect of the ex parte awards which were sought to be executed by the claimants on 8-2-1995. In this connection, he went to the court on the date fixed in the three notices on 8-3-1995 and upon inspection of record of cases, mentioned in the aforesaid notices, he came to know about the e

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top