IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BENCH
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.
Victim A – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 1008 of 2021
Decided On : 03-02-2021
PREGNANCY - RAPE - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 5(1) - The court allowed the termination of pregnancy of a rape victim after considering the medical report and the victim's fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a rape victim, sought termination of pregnancy as she was impregnated by the accused who refused to marry her. The medical report confirmed the possibility of termination of pregnancy.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India to choose not to give birth to the child must be respected.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner had the liberty to refuse to give birth to a child after being impregnated by the accused who refused to marry her.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the fundamental right of the petitioner under Article 21 of the Constitution of India to allow the termination of pregnancy.
Final Decision: The court allowed the termination of pregnancy and directed the authorities to carry out the procedure, ensuring postoperative care of the petitioner.
JUDGMENT :
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-
"(I) Issue a writ in the like nature commanding the concerned respondent for the termination of pregnancy of the petitioner to secure life and future of the petitioner.
(II) To grant any other relief deemed proper to the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. The facts necessary for disposal of the present petition in short are that the petitioner has filed this petition on the allegation that she came to Jabalpur on 1.6.2020 for training as Community Health Officer and during verification of the documents, she met with accused Sonu Chouraya, R/o. District Chhindwara, who helped her out in verification of the documents. Thereafter, they became friends and exchanged their mobile numbers. On various occasions, accused Sonu Chouraya expressed his feelings that he is in love with her and wants to marry her. When the petitioner informed that she belonged to scheduled caste then accused Sonu Chouraya expressed that he is ready for inter-caste marriage. On 26.6.2020, on the date of the birth of the petitioner, accused Sonu Chouraya proposed her and inspite of her reluctance, he had physical relations with her. It was also expressed by Sonu Chouraya that from today she is his wife and on the pretext of marriage, Sonu Chouraya had physical relations with her. On 25.11.2020 at about 10:00 p.m., Sonu Chouraya informed that tomorrow he would talk to his parents about the marriage and also had physical relations with her on the said date. On 26.11.2020, Sonu Chouraya went back to his house and now she has come to know that she is pregnant. When the fact of pregnancy was informed to Sonu Chouraya then he refused to marry her on the ground that he cannot marry her without permission of his parents and also insisted that now the prosecutrix must look after her and should not rely on him. On the basis of the report made by the petitioner, the police has registered Crime No. 452/2020 at Police Station Omti, District Jabalpur for the offence under Sections 376, 376(2)(n), 417 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was infact raped by Sonu Chouraya by misconception of fact that he would marry her and, therefore, the consent of the petitioner is no consent as per the provision of Section 90 of the Indian Penal Code. It is further submitted that now the petitioner has got the appointment and in case if she is compelled to deliver a child then it would amount to mental trauma and agony to the petitioner as well as it would be impossible for the petitioner to upbring the child.
4. This Court by order dated 28.1.2021 had directed the respondent No. 4 to constitute a Medical Board for medical examination of the petitioner as well as to produce the report of the Medical Board whether termination of the pregnancy may cause any medical complication or not and whether at this stage the termination of pregnancy is possible or not.
5. Learned Panel Lawyer for the State has produced the medial report prepared by the Medical Board in a sealed cover, which reads as under:-
The CMO
Jabalpur
Sub:- Opinion regarding termination of pregnancy of victim-A (the name of the victim is not being mentioned) D/o Umakant, Age 28 years Case No. WP-1008-2021
Sir,
In reference to your letter No. 1175/Legal/2021 dated 29.1.2021, we have examined the Victim-A, D/o Umakant, Age 28 years and findings are as follows.
She is having amenorrhea of 3 months. LMP=4.1.2020. She is unmarried. She is k/c/o Hypothyroidism: 10 years taking Tablet Thyroxin 75 mp. 1 OD
| On examination GC – fair T-afebrile Pollor-+ Edema-Nil Ictrus-Nil P= 82/min BP=110/70 mhg CVS-NAD RS-chest clean | P | ||
AI
The fundamental right of a woman to choose not to give birth to a child is a dimension of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Termination of pregnancy in minors requires careful consideration of health risks and emotional trauma, recognizing the need for judicial permission under statute.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, particularly in cases involving minors and pregnancies resulting....
The court affirmed that a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy, especially in cases of rape, is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution, emphasizing her autonomy and bodily integrity.
The judgment establishes the right of a rape victim to terminate pregnancy based on the risk to her life and mental health, as provided in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
Rightly to reproductive autonomy – It is woman alone who has right over her body and is ultimate decision-maker on question of whether she wants to undergo an abortion.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the anguish suffered by a rape victim can constitute grave injury to mental health, permitting the termination of pregnancy under the Medical ....
The court affirmed that a minor's right to terminate a pregnancy resulting from sexual assault is protected under personal liberty, emphasizing the need for medical supervision and parental consent.
Termination of unwanted pregnancy - Petitioner being a minor, 'substituted judgment' test would apply - Petitioner who is only sixteen years of age, does not want to continue with her pregnancy.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.