IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY, J.
Xyz Nil - Petitioner
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. – Respondents
WPC No. 2047 of 2024
Decided On : 12-04-2024
(A) Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Section 3 - Writ petition for permission to terminate pregnancy of minor victim - The petitioner, a minor, sought permission for abortion due to pregnancy resulting from sexual assault - Medical Board's report indicated that continuation of pregnancy poses risks to her physical and mental health - Court emphasized the importance of reproductive rights and the need for consent from guardians - The court allowed the petition for termination of pregnancy under supervision of medical practitioners. (Paras 6, 8, 12, 14)
(B) Reproductive Rights - The court reiterated that a woman's right to make reproductive choices is a dimension of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution - The decision must prioritize the best interests of the victim. (Paras 8, 9)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a minor girl, became pregnant due to sexual assault and sought permission for abortion. The Medical Board confirmed the risks associated with continuing the pregnancy.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the continuation of the pregnancy could cause grave injury to the mental health of the petitioner and allowed the termination.
Issues: The main issues included the minor's right to terminate her pregnancy and the implications of continuing the pregnancy on her health.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the minor's reproductive rights must be respected, and the decision should be based on medical advice and the best interests of the victim.
Result: Writ petition allowed.
ORDER :
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J.)
By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief(s):-
10.2. Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon'ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted."
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner (ABC, minor girl) through her natural guardian XYZ, seeking permission for the termination of pregnancy of the petitioner (ABC Minor).
3. The brief facts of the present case are that the complainant/mother of the victim lodged an FIR on 26.03.2024 against the minor accused, who committed sexual assault on the person of the victim on false pretext of marriage. The petitioner conceived and at present, she is carrying pregnancy of 21-22 weeks. On such complaint, the police registered the FIR for commission of offence punishable under Section 376(2)(n) of IPC.
4. The petitioner approached the police authorities, who, in turn, advised her to approach this Court seeking permission for termination of unwanted pregnancy. On 9.4.2024, this matter was taken up for hearing and a direction was issued to the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Korba to constitute a Board according to the provisions of Rule 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003 and to submit a report according to the Section 3(2) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 by 12.4.2024.
5. Today, the report has been placed on record. According to report dated 11.4.2024, the victim is carrying pregnancy of 21 weeks and with the consent of parents of the victim, the unwanted pregnancy can be terminated.
6. So far as the proceedings for termination of pregnancy are concerned, the law in this regard has been framed in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 {as amended by the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021}. Section 3 of the said Act specifically deals with the conditions which are required and which have to be adhered to. For ready reference, Section 3 of the said Act is reproduced herein under:-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), a registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under that Code or under any other law for the time being in force, if any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner, -
(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twenty weeks, if such medical practitioner is, or
(b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twenty weeks but does not exceed twenty-four weeks in case of such category of woman as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act, if not less than two registered medical practitioners are, of the opinion, formed in good faith, that, -
(i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or mental health; or
(ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer from any serious physical or mental abnormality.
Explanation 1.-For the purposes of clause (a), where any pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any woman or her partner for the purpose of limiting the number of children or preventing pregnancy, the anguish caused by such pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
Explanation 2.-For the purposes of clauses (a) and (b), where any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by the pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant
Suchita Srivastav & Another v. Chandigarh Administration
The court affirmed that a minor's right to terminate a pregnancy resulting from sexual assault is protected under personal liberty, emphasizing the need for medical supervision and parental consent.
The court affirmed the victim's right to terminate her pregnancy exceeding 24 weeks, emphasizing mental health considerations as paramount, grounded in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act's prov....
The court affirmed that termination of pregnancy after 20 weeks for rape victims is permissible when mental and physical health risks are evident, prioritizing the victim’s best interests.
Termination of unwanted pregnancy - Petitioner being a minor, 'substituted judgment' test would apply - Petitioner who is only sixteen years of age, does not want to continue with her pregnancy.
The court affirmed that medical termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks is not permissible unless specific medical criteria are met, emphasizing the need to balance the reproductive rights of the gu....
A minor's consent is paramount in the decision to terminate a pregnancy, emphasizing reproductive rights and autonomy under Article 21.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.