SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 200

SUJOY PAUL, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
Krsnaa Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Piyush Mathur with Manu Maheshwari for petitioner;
Vivek Dalal, Additional Advocate General with Ms.Kirti Patwardhan, Panel Lawyer for respondent No. 1/State; Prasanna Prasad for respondent No. 2.

ORDER

Paul, J. -- 1. The petitioner, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to assail the letter dated 7.10.2020 (Annexure P/9) whereby it was intimated that the tender is scrapped and the bank guarantees furnished by him were returned. It is further prayed that respondents be directed to proceed further in the NIT and execute the agreement with the petitioner by issuing letter of acceptance for Cluster (II), (III) and (IV). By amending the petition, new NIT is also called in question.

2. Draped in brevity, the admitted facts between the parties are that respondent No.3 floated an NIT dated 10.12.2019 for setting up, operating, managing and maintenance of computerized tomography – CT and MRI diagonostic facility at six government medical colleges namely Datia, Khandwa, Ratlam, Vidisha, Shahdol and Shivpuri with four more colleges namely Rewa, Sagar, Indore and Jabalpur. The aforesaid 10 colleges were divided in four different clusters. The NIT issued by the respondent No.3 (Director, Med

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top