SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 695 ; 2019 Supreme(MP) 715

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
HULUVADI G. RAMESH, B.K. SHRIVASTAVA, JJ.
Smt. Kamini Yadav – Petitioner
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 25986 of 2018
Decided On : 04-02-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shri Ghanshyam Pandey.
For the Respondent: Shri Shashank Shekhar.

Point of Law: Quash of detention order - Authorities are not precluded from passing an order of detention when the person concerned is in jail, but while passing the order of detention, they are required to apply their mind to the fact that the person concerned is already in jail and there are compelling reasons justifying such detention despite the fact that the detenu was already in detention and the compelling reasons implies that there must be cogent material before the Detaining Authority

Headnote:

National Security Act, 1980 - Clause 2 of Section 3 – Detention order – Challenged – General disturbance of public tranquility - District Magistrate passed the order of detention of accused for the period of three months from the date of actual detention preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order - Whether the detention of the said person would be necessary after he is released from jail, and if the authority is bona-fide satisfied that such detention is necessary, he can make a valid order of detention a few days before the person is likely to be released

Finding of the Court:

authorities are not precluded from passing an order of detention when the person concerned is in jail, but while passing the order of detention, they are required to apply their mind to the fact that the person concerned is already in jail and there are compelling reasons justifying such detention despite the fact that the detenu was already in detention and the compelling reasons implies that there must be cogent material before the Detaining Authority on the basis of which it may be satisfied that the detenu is likely to be released from custody in the near future or taking into account the nature of the antecedent activities of the detenu, it is likely that after his release from custody he would indulge in prejudicial activities and it is necessary to detain him in order to prevent him from engaging in such activities - Most the cases registered against the petitioner were related to Excise Act. Any offence related to public was not registered. The offence under IPC were related to the specific person not to the public and the aforesaid person entered in the compromise and the accused was acquitted in that offence. Therefore, the case of Kamla Bai (supra) does not help the respondents.

Result: Petition allowed

ORDER :

1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on 29.10.2018 by Smt. Kamini Yadav, who is the wife of detenu Suraj alias Sonu Yadav R/o H. No. 123, Near Primary School, Gorabazar, Police Station Gorabazar, District Jabalpur (M.P.).

2. The petition has been filed to challenge the detention Order No. 15/NSA/RDM/2018, dated 11.10.2018 passed by Collector and District Magistrate, Jabalpur in exercise of power under clause 2 of Section 3 of National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1980”). By the aforesaid order the District Magistrate passed the order of detention of accused for the period of three months from the date of actual detention preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.

(ii) Detention Order No. 15/NSA/RDM/2018, Jabalpur dated, 11.10.2018 is quoted below in Hindi and English:-

^^U;k;ky; ftyk n.Mkf/kdkjh ftyk tcyiqj ¼e-Á-½

vkns'k

Øekad@15@,uŒ,lŒ,Œ@vkjŒMhŒ,eŒ@2018

tcyiqj] fnukad 11-10-2018

1- pwafd esa Nfo Hkkj}kt] ftyk n.Mkf/kdkjh ftyk tcyiqj dks ;g lek/kku gks x;k gS fd vukosnd lwjt ;kno mQZ lksuw firk LoŒ j?kqukFk ;kno mez 41 lky fuoklh eŒuaŒ 123 ÁkbZejh Ldwy ds ikl xksjkcktkj Fkkuk xksjkcktkj ftyk tcyiqj ¼eŒÁŒ½ dks yksd O;oLFkk cuk;s j[kus ds Áfrdwy fdlh Hkh jhfr ls dk;ksZ dks djus ls jksdus ds vfHkÁk; ls mls jk"Vªh; lqj{kk vf/kfu;e 1980 dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼2½ ds v/khu fu:) fd;k tkuk vko';d gSA

2- vr,o mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼2½ ds }kjk ÁnRr 'kfDr;ksa dks Á;ksx esa ykrs gq;s eSa Nfo Hkkj}kt] ftyk n.Mkf/kdkjh ftyk tcyiqj ,rn~ }kjk ;g vkns'k nsrk gwa fd vukosnd lwjt ;kno mQZ lksuw firk LoŒ j?kqukFk ;kno mez 41 lky fuoklh eŒuaŒ 123 ÁkbZejh Ldwy ds ikl xksjkcktkj Fkkuk xksjkcktkj ftyk tcyiqj ¼eŒÁŒ½ dks fu:) fd;k tkdj dsUæh; tsy tcyiqj esa j[kk tkosA

3- ;g vkns'k vukosnd dks fu:) fd;s tkus dh okLrfod frfFk ls vkxkeh 03 ¼rhu½ ekg dh vof/k ds fy;s oS/k gksxkA

lgh@&

¼Nfo Hkkj}kt½

ftyk n.Mkf/kdkjh

tcyiqj

i`"Bkd Øekad@15@,uŒ,lŒ,Œ@vkjŒMhŒ,eŒ@2018] tcyiqj] fnukad 11-10-2018

Áfrfyfi %&

1- iqfyl v/kh{kd] tcyiqjA

2- v/kh{kd] dsUæh; tsy] tcyiqjA

3- mi[k.M eftLVsªV xksj[kiqj ftyk tcyiqjA

4- Fkkuk ÁHkkjh] Fkkuk xksjkcktkj tcyiqjA

¼Nfo Hkkj}kt½

ftyk n.Mkf/kdkjh

tcyiqjA**

“COURT OF THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE. JABALPUR (M.P.) ORDER

No.......15/N.S.A./R.D.M./2018

JABALPUR DATED 11-10-2018

1. Whereas I, Chhavi Bhardwaj, District Magistrate, District Jabalpur, am satisfied that with a view to preventing Suraj Yadav @ Sonu S/o Shri Raghunath Yadav Age 41 Years R/o H. No. 123 Near Primary School, P.S. Gorabazar District Jabalpur (M.P.) From action in any manner prejudicial to maintenance of Public Order it is necessary to detain him under Sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act. 1980.

2. Now therefore in exercise of the power conferred by Sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the said Act. I, Chhavi Bhardwaj, District Magistrate, District Jabalpur hereby order Suraj Yadav @ Sonu S/o Shri Raghunath Yadav Age 41 Years R/o H. No. 123 Near Primary School, P.S. Gorabazar District Jabalpur (M.P.) may be so detained and kept in Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Central Jail, Jabalpur.

3 This order will be valid for a period of upcoming 03 (three) months from the date of actual detention.

(Chhavi Bhardwaj)

District Magistrate,

District Jabalpur (M.P.)

No.......15/N.S.A./R.D.M./2018

JABALPUR DATED 11-10-2018

Copy to:

1. Superintendent of Police Jabalpur.

2. Superintendent, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Central Jail, Jabalpur.

3. S.D.M. Gorakhpur District Jabalpur.

4. T.I., P.S. Gorabazar Jabalpur

(Chhavi Bhardwaj)

District Magistrate,

District Jabalpur (M.P.)”

3. It appears from the order that:-

(A) District Magistrate has passed the order in purported exercise of provision contained in Section 3(2) of the Act of 1980.

(B) Husband of the petitioner named Suraj Yadav @ Sonu is ordered to be kept in Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Central Jail, Jabalpur, preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to maintenance of public order.

4. After passing the order, the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top