RAVI MALIMATH, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Sunil Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur (M. P. ) – Respondent
ORDER
1. The instant writ appeal takes exception to order dated 10.1.2006 (Annexure-A-1) passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.3718 of 2001, whereby, the petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed against termination of his services.
2. The facts of the case are that the appellant applied for appointment on the post of Water-man under the establishment of District and Sessions Judge, Chhindwara. Pursuant to his application, a call letter dated 25.7.1994 was issued for his interview. After interview, the appellant was selected and vide order dated 29.07.1994 (Annexure-R-1), he was appointed as full time Water-man against Contingency Fund. The appellant further states that having found his service satisfactory, he was given promotion on the post of Peon vide order dated 1.5.1996. He states that he continued to work on the post of Peon. He was on continuous duty till 2.1.2000. However, on account of a false case registered against him at the instance of one D.R. Baghel, who was working as Naib Nazir, the appellant was taken into custody. When the appellant was released, he immediately, submitted an application in prescribed format for earned leave. However, with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.